Update: The item in question was removed by the auction house on 2/2/10
An addendum to our lawsuit story involving an authentication company called PSA/DNA. Not only did this company reject a genuine Robert Fitzsimmons autographed item we sold without providing an explanation or any supporting evidence, now it is certifying a non-authentic Robert Fitzsimmons autograph which can be proven otherwise.
Our opinion with supporting evidence:
Yet another example of why I do not accept the opinion of third party authenticators. Item #2 is currently up for auction as of 1/28/10 with current bidding at $1,129 and two weeks remaining. Compare this item #2 to the ALS written by Fitzsimmons' manager Martin Julian #1 and you can plainly see the handwriting is one and the same.
1. |
|
2. #2 is a PSA/DNA non authentic pre-certified Fitzsimmons signature. At best, an attempt by Fitz' manager to make it look as though it was signed by Fitzsimmons himself. |
#1162 - Bob Fitzsimmons
|
_______________________________________________________________ |
|
3. |
4. #4 is the envelope which accompanied item #5 and is all in the hand of Fitzsimmons. Note the formation of the "T" in "Temple" is consistent with the "T" in "Truly" in #3 which are both inconsistent with the non-authentic item #2 |
I've included the two authentic examples of Robert Fitzsimmons' signature below to show the amazing consistency over time. There is a 21 year and 8 month gap between the signing of the two examples. Note the pen lifts in "Fitzsimmons" remained consistent over time (after the "F", the "t", the first "s" and the second "m", sometimes more difficult to tell as he would occasionally come back down on the previous letter when starting the next), refer to #'s 3, 5 and 6. Note in PSA/DNA's non-authentic example #2 the pen lifts after the "F" and "z" only
5. |
6. |
7. #7 is from the Corbett-Fitzsimmons contract which was signed by Fitzsimmons in December of 1896, same year as the PSA non-authentic item represented in #2. Note the inconsistencies when compared to #2 and the similarities when compared to the authentic exemplars represented in #'s 3, 5 & 6. Also note Fitzsimmons manager Martin Julian has also signed in the lower left corner. |
How does a company
authenticate a genuine signature when they have non-authentic exemplars in their
files?
Why does this PSA/DNA company make
the claim...
PSA/DNA is a
state-of-the-art autograph authentication service developed by Professional
Sports Authenticator (PSA) of Newport Beach, California. Utilizing a specially
synthesized DNA technology provided by DNA Technologies, Inc., PSA/DNA provides
legitimacy to autographed collectibles and helps combat the problem of
counterfeits
... and then
continues to push their non-authentic crap into our hobby?
Third party authenticators and forgers have one very similar distinction, they both rely on the uneducated and uninformed for their business. Educate yourself by accumulating a file of exemplars and inform yourself by reviewing the material contained within these two web sites. Full of evidence supplied by third party authenticators themselves, their own worst detractor.